Castleford Tigers Suffer Crushing Defeat Against St Helens
In a humiliating display, the Castleford Tigers fell victim to a 60-4 thrashing at the hands of the mighty St Helens. Despite the visitors being reduced to 12 men early on, Castleford’s Craig Lingard was left bitterly disappointed by his side’s “extremely poor” performance, particularly in the second half.
The Game’s Turning Point
The game had initially shown signs of being a close encounter, with Castleford trailing by just 8-4 at halftime. However, the dismissal of Liam Horne in the 52nd minute proved to be the turning point, as St Helens proceeded to hammer home their advantage, scoring an unanswered 52 points.
Lingard’s Scathing Critique
Lingard minced no words in his assessment of the Tigers’ display, slamming their “immense amount of naivety” and inability to capitalize on the numerical advantage. He lamented their tendency to “go wide too soon” and failure to “test them out” with inside balls and leg tackles when Saints were down to 12 men.
“Their performance was just dumb rugby, and they were taking shortcuts instead of being smart in their approach.”
A Concerning Collapse
The second-half collapse was even more alarming, with Castleford managing to touch the ball just four times in the entire 28-minute period. Lingard described their performance as “just dumb rugby” and criticized his players for “taking shortcuts” instead of being smart in their approach.
Implications for the Tigers
This humiliating defeat comes as a major setback for the Tigers, who had been showing signs of improvement in recent weeks, with wins over London Broncos and a draw against Leigh Leopards. Lingard will now have a week to regroup his team before a crucial clash against fellow strugglers Hull FC.
For the rugby league enthusiasts, this result will certainly raise questions about Castleford’s resilience and ability to bounce back from such a crushing blow. As the season progresses, the Tigers will need to demonstrate a stronger mentality and tactical awareness to avoid further embarrassment and climb up the table.
đź”— Source
